Search for: "State v. White" Results 6061 - 6080 of 13,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Refusing to dismiss a Section 1981 race discrimination claim by a news anchor who claimed that she was fired over her Facebook comments on a recent mass shooting because she is white, a federal district court in Pennsylvania found her allegations sufficient for the pleading stage (O’Toole v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:24 pm by Ashlee Grant
” Applying the “traditional tools of statutory construction” set forth in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:22 pm by Kevin
The new design is said to depict a peaceful country scene, devoid of anything that could be mistaken for “a white man throttling an Indian. [read post]
It will likely lead to increased baseline salaries for a number of lower-level white collar workers. [read post]
It will likely lead to increased baseline salaries for a number of lower-level white collar workers. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:52 pm by Joy Waltemath
According to the state plaintiffs, the language of the white-collar exemption was unambiguous. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Walter Haydock
The year prior, an avowed white supremacist gunned down nine parishioners in a church in Charleston, South Carolina. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Christina Duffy Ponsa
United States, which in 1923 held that Bhaghat Singh Thind, “a high caste Hindu, of full Indian blood, born [in] India” was not “a white person” under the naturalization laws. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm by Michael Froomkin
The current state-of–the-art thrust to power for a Hall thruster is on the order of 60mN/kW. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
 [It should be clear, incidentally, that Burns violated the law by fleeing his confinement as a slave, and the august Supreme Court, in the worst single decision in our history, worse even than Dred Scott, upheld the Fugitive Slave Law of 1893 in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Rick Houghton
  Articles IV and V oblige the U.S government and Soviet Union to destroy the missiles’ “launchers[,] support structures and support equipment . . . associated with such missiles and launchers. [read post]