Search for: "Study v. State" Results 6061 - 6080 of 15,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 8:31 am by jonathanturley
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Powell bars habeas relief if the state fails to raise Stone in the district court, or whether Stone announced a categorical rule that Fourth Amendment claims are not cognizable on habeas review absent a showing that the state prisoner was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in state court; (2) whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in relying on studies that were not part of the… [read post]
United States, in which the Supreme Court had to determine the ordinary meaning of the phrase “carries a firearm. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 They studied Georgia's death penalty, did rigorous statistical analysis. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by Steve Hall
  His study of racial disparities in the application of Georgia's death penalty served as the foundation of the landmark Supreme Court case, McCleskey v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:22 pm
State and local government agencies have public trust duties - Kelly v. 1250 Oceanside Partners, 111 Haw. 205, 140 P.3d 985 (2006). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Kolber, Brooklyn Law School ‘Fire Away’: I Have No Right to Not Be Insulted, Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 290, David Barnhizer, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University Next Week in the Courts On 3 or 4 February 2016 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Lewison and Ryder LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Leslie v NGN. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
It’s very clear that the Supreme Court recently gave pharmaceutical companies broad latitude to study and experiment with compounds covered by other companies’ patents in its recent decision, Merck KGaA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
”  When the CFPB announced its plans in October 2012 to study compliance costs, it stated that it hoped “to become better and smarter regulators” through its research. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm by Khiara M. Bridges
(Justice Brennan cited it in his dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
To reach its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]