Search for: "True v True"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 33,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:32 am
That changed with Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:03 am
The Court of Appeals rejects these arguments and affirms the verdict.The case is O'Hara v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:04 am
Univ. of Kentucky v. 40-0, 2021 USPQ2d 253, at *32. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:05 am
This is probably the least important news of the day, but the Supreme Court has denied cert in DuPont v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:24 am
The Court of Appeals says the judge has to convene a hearing to see if the lawyer lacked authority to dismiss these claims.The case is Gomez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
I published this blog's first post on March 19, 2013, a critique of the theater of oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:07 am
" The lawyers appealing from a grant of summary judgment in a Business Court case, Carter v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 6:49 pm
The case, People v Bylsma, arose out of Kent County and is distinctive because it is the first case under the Act that involves a collective grow operation.Ryan Bylsma was a certified care provider under the MMMA. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:31 am
Read about the New York case in Neil Cahn’s blog post Here or the actual court opinion In the Matter of Melody M v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:43 am
You can extend the 300 day period under the "continuing violations" theory, but that's unpredictable.The case is Cohen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
When the case reached federal court, the judge refused to dismiss the unfair labor practice petition but also declined to enter an injunction against the hotel.The case is Paulson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 10:41 am
Given that the court deciding it is the jurisdiction where the Board actually sits, seems to me to pose even more problems, that might not be true if the decision were made in another jurisdiction.While folks may disagree with the results of the decision, and already news media are pointing out that the three judges who sat on the panel are Republican appointees, they should read the opinion first. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:15 am
The statement (full text) by law professors Gerard V. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 6:32 am
" State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
QUAST v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
The case is Crawford v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:33 am
The case is Navarette v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
The Court of Appeals revives the excessive force claim.The case is Simcoe v. [read post]
