Search for: "United States v. Gooding"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 18,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm
As our readers are by now aware, on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned a legal precedent known as “Chevron deference” by a 6-3 vote. [read post]
In a dispute over the meaning of a procedural rule, justices seem settled: “Mistake” means “mistake”
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am
United States was an unusual argument, as the justices seemed to come to the bench resolved to settle the case with an answer proposed by neither of the parties. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:43 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 654, 661, 116 S.Ct. 1638, 134 L.Ed.2d 880 (1996), the Supreme Court stated that Rule 4's 120-day time period for service "operates not as an outer limit subject to reduction, but as an irreducible allowance. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
After receiving the stolen data, [she] re-sold the information to her co-conspirators in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:31 pm
As required by United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:45 am
That’s good policy, and good Fourth Amendment law. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:45 am
A 1997 case decided by the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, is a good example of what can happen when an insurance company doesn't pay a claim in a prompt manner. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals this week found in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
The court also cited a United States Supreme Court case, Arthur v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:17 am
This morning, in a 5-3 decision (Sotomayor recused herself), the United States Supreme Court issued a pro-arbitration decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
In one of the two oppositions the involved marks were identical (BACCARAT), and in the other the goods were overlapping (clothing).Baccarat S.A. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 11:54 am
As one federal appellate court explained in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Comm. on Foreign Investment in the United States, No. 12-cv-01513 (D.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
