Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 25,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:02 am
[because plaintiff] felt that it would be uncontested that any sales-related activity conducted by REA as to Renesas’ products in the United States would be activity attributable to Renesas. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:02 am
In First Investment Corporation of the Marshall Islands v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
(Indeed, the Court had chosen to limit the cert grant to just the adequate-and-independent-state-ground issue.) [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Indeed, the kind of Norwich Pharmacal order sought by the plaintiff in Muwema had been granted in the High Court in London as long ago as 2008 (see Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)) and was recently granted in Nova Scotia in Olsen v Facebook 2016 NSSC 155 (CanLII) (17 June 2016)). [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Arzoumanian v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
3 May 2009, 9:19 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:00 am
Matter of Collins v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that another of the new grants, Monasky v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
This Week, United States Supreme Court Rules DNA Tests Can Be Done On Innocent People Arrested – and Stored in National DNA Database On Monday, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:51 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 10:03 am
Indeed, in a recent decision, Grant v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:01 am
” The court granted review in Elonis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
United States Postal Service, the patent owner, Return Mail, demanded that the Postal Service pay it for a patent license. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:14 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of KentuckyOpinion Date: 12/17/09Cite: Carrier Vibrating Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
