Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 6061 - 6080 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:51 am by Rosalind English
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom (15 December 2011) – read judgment The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has ruled today that convictions based on statements from witnesses who could not be cross examined in court did not violate the applicants’ rights under Article 6(3) (d) to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses  fair trial. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Jason
The initial claims for asbestos related diseases were filed as workers’ compensation claims in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by SJM
Minter v Mole Valley District Council was heard by DJ George on 25th May 2011 and it was reported in the papers here. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by SJM
Minter v Mole Valley District Council was heard by DJ George on 25th May 2011 and it was reported in the papers here. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:30 am by Peter Bert
The live streaming is being made available pursuant to Article 10.21.2 of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Brandon W. Barnett
This Tuesday (6 Dec 11), the United States Supreme Court heard another Confrontation Clause case (Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
 This week, the New York  Times wrote a short article informing its readers of the case that is going before the United States Supreme Court out of California, Martel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Arguments at the United States Supreme Court continued on December 6, 2011, as the justices heard oral arguments for the case of Sandy Williams, Petitioner v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
United States, which was heard on Nov.30th. -- the Court here considering whether a federal judge may impose a sentence and direct that it be served consecutively to, or concurrently with, a term of imprisonment that is expected to be – but has not yet been – imposed in a [read post]