Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 6,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
On the Thornton issue, Lord Sumption (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) said: 7. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 6:20 am
I'm not the only one who has this problem with commenters, as Orin Kerr and Walter Olson have both recently taken strong positions about ridding themselves of the nuisance. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
In hearing these appeals, Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed, Carnwath and Briggs also had the opportunity to hear argument on whether undeserving parents should be allowed to profit from the residence of their innocent children by “piggybacking” off their rights and best interests. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
SSHD, Lord Kerr stated, “in reaching decisions that will affect a child, a primacy of importance must be accorded to his or her best interests. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Co-Conspirator Orin Kerr, among others, ably represented Los Angeles. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
On 6 December 2019, following a four-day defamation trial at a federal court in Los Angeles, a jury has found in favour of Elon Musk, ruling that he did not defame a British caver Vernon Unsworth, who helped in last year’s rescue of trapped Thai schoolboys by calling him a “pedo guy”. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:04 pm
Yesterday, FBI Director James Comey said that federal law enforcement officials determined hours before the cartoon contest in Garland, Texas that one of the gunmen had expressed interest in going to the event. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am
Then, as Orin Kerr notes, around 1970, the number of clerks was increased from two to three, and by the 1980s, to four. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
Further, following Lady Hale and Lord Kerr’s judgments in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Article 3(1) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child 1959 should be applied such that a primacy of importance must be given to the best interests of a child. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 13 November 2018 there was a hearing in the Privy Council (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lords Briggs and Kitchin) of an Isle of Man libel appeal, Nugent v Willers. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:31 pm
This past week we heard from Lauryn Kerr, Legal Counsel at the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, at the Legal Innovators Roundtable at Thomson Reuters in Toronto. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On 1 February 2023, the Supreme Court gave judgment on the private nuisance case of Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Lords Hodge, Reed and Kerr are likely to utilise their Scottish and Irish legal backgrounds to address issues of the inter-relationship of national laws and devolved institutions. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
Kerr v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
On 27 January 2020 the Government published its response to the Cairncross Review on its website. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
Brotherton, third from left, with, from left, Richard McDermott, deputy chief marshal of Royal Portrush; Ian Frier, deputy chief marshal of Carnoustie; Gary Hawker, chief marshal of Carnoustie; Chris Smith, assistant deputy chief marshal of Carnoustie; and Euan Kerr, assistant deputy chief marshal of Carnoustie at the British Open. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The defendant appealed to the High court and Kerr J allowed the appeal on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process as it constituted an attempt to re-litigate issues previously determined and undermine the claimant’s criminal convictions. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
., Dec. 15, 2014) (available online here and discussed by Professor Orin Kerr here). [read post]
