Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 9,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm
Today, the Court heard argument in Kingsley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:40 pm
From Illoominate Media, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:16 pm
An opinion from the Eighth Circuit this past July won’t leave me alone (Walker v Trinity Marine Products, Inc). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:26 am
See Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United… [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
The court says this “might be material” to determining whether Knapke is bound by Reilly’s actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
Cloverleaf Creamery Co. (1981) 449 U.S. 456, 464, 101 S.Ct. 715, 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (Minnesota), citing United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:53 am
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
Justice Brown held as follows: [38] In any case, on the question of requiring the plaintiff to sign the Jurisdiction agreement, I am bound by Desjardins (Litigation guardian of) v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:28 am
" State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:01 am
"This" is the opinion of the Honorable Ann Aiken of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in Mayfield v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Like the sentencing court, the preparer of a presentence report is neither a party to nor bound by a plea agreement between the defendant and the state and, therefore, cannot breach the terms of that agreement in preparing the report. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:46 pm
§ 229 violated constitutional principles of federalism because it was not based on a valid exercise of congressional authority, it did not require proof of a federal interest, it was vague and overbroad, and it failed to provide fair notice of the conduct covered by its terms.The Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case is Ahlers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:10 pm
Supreme Court that hears only 60 appeals from the 42,000 decisions issued annually by the federal courts of appeals, not to mention the federal questions decided annually by the State Supreme Courts, see Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 am
Space-related legislation was recently codified into the new Title 51 of the United States Code (see earlier Blogson post); it’s currently incorporated in the unofficial versions on LexisNexis and Westlaw and the annual bound Supplement IV to the official USC. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
The Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
