Search for: "California Department of Justice" Results 6081 - 6100 of 9,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Sheppard Mullin
Attorney General Kamala Harris supported the new law and recently has taken action to enforce CalOPPA, including creating a Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit within the California State Department of Justice and notifying mobile application companies of the applicability of CalOPPA and potential noncompliance with CalOPPA. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:15 am by Sheppard Mullin
Attorney General Kamala Harris supported the new law and recently has taken action to enforce CalOPPA, including creating a Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit within the California State Department of Justice and notifying mobile application companies of the applicability of CalOPPA and potential noncompliance with CalOPPA. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
With the writing clearly on the wall, the federal Department of Justice testified before Congress earlier this year that even they were OK with a warrant requirement. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:40 am by Eric
An assessment of winners and losers from this new law: Winner: California's Department of Justice’s Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:47 am by Walter Olson
Department of Justice has dropped efforts to seize/forfeit the property of landlords renting to California legal medical marijuana dispensaries [Nick Schou/OC Weekly, Reason] And [h/t commenter Gitarcarver] South Florida’s Sun-Sentinel has an expose of forfeiture doings in Sunrise, Fla. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Eugene Volokh
The matter must therefore be returned to the Department with instructions either to conduct a new hearing at which that issue is addressed, or to modify its decision to find the report unfounded and to notify the Department of Justice that the report must be expunged from CACI. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:05 am
Department of Justice), protecting personal information is key to avoiding becoming the victim of fraud. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 7:40 am by Page Pate
Copyrighted Material by The Pate Law FirmLast week, the Justice Department announced a $17.5 million settlement agreement with a California company accused of violating the federal and California False Claims Acts by paying kickbacks for referrals of certain mobile lab and radiology services. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 12:06 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This requirement has nothing to do with the defendant's state of mind at the time he departed. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case will be heard by an eight-member Court; Justice Elena Kagan is not taking part. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:25 am by Joe Consumer
 In all, 11 hospitals have agreed to settlements with the Justice Department, resolving civil allegations of needless stenting and related wrongdoing. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:21 am by Joe May
The Raleigh Police Department conducted undercover surveillance at meetings of the North Carolina chapter of the NACCP held to organize the mass protests. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
., but the issue the Justices are to decide is whether that connection was significant enough to give a federal district court in California jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:42 am by Jonathan Tycko
According to the Department of Justice, since January 2009, over $10.3 billion has been recovered from health care fraud cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:09 pm by Stanley Radtke
Justice Strategies estimated that California taxpayers were spending $65 million each year to hold immigrants for ICE. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Justice Department lawyers urged the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:34 am by David Markus
District Court for the Northern District of California also found misconduct in the case, but ruled it was a "harmless error" and upheld the conviction of the defendant, La Carl Martez Dow. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
Several New York trial courts and the Appellate Division, First Department, have held the testimony of this particular witness to be inadmissible on the ground that expert testimony with respect to such matters is improper. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Jamison Koehler
  He is contradicted by the representative from the Inspector General:  There is a big difference between being cleared and having the Department of Justice decide not to prosecute. [read post]