Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 6081 - 6100 of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Golan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
The application was dismissed with costs to the Claimant, but the Single Joint Expert was ordered to give oral evidence at trial and to be cross examined on the issue of defective damp-proofing. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
The application was dismissed with costs to the Claimant, but the Single Joint Expert was ordered to give oral evidence at trial and to be cross examined on the issue of defective damp-proofing. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
C), and in  federal court, al-Nashiri v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:00 am by Thalia Kruger
Concluding remarks All in all, the issue of the cross-border protection of Adults has rightly gained attention over the past ten years. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:52 am by David Gans
  On June 21, the Fourth Circuit will hear North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:04 am
  Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:24 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
By a judgment of 30 July 2013 (available only in French), a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found that Switzerland had violated its obligations under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in a cross-border case concerning the return of a minor and his custody (application No. 33169/10, Polidario v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
A complete discussion in North Carolina would also need to include State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by Rick Garnett
The case does not involve what’s become the usual stuff of the Court’s church-state caselaw:  prayer at football games, war-memorial crosses in the desert, manger scenes and Ten Commandments monuments in public parks. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:38 am by Benjamin Wittes
Haven’t read this yet, but U.S. v. [read post]