Search for: "Doe v. Smith" Results 6081 - 6100 of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
They took the position that the statute "does not preclude States from imposing different or additional remedies, but only different or additional requirements. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 15 March 2012 partial permission to appeal was given by Dame Janet Smith in the case of Waterson v Lloyds. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” The Court stated: “We do not – and the law does not – assume that lawyers will fail to do their duty, even when the duty is painful and difficult. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
In prior posts on this blog, including one discussing the fine opinion in People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
His opinion has been the target of criticism (see ObiterJ’s post, Roger Smith’s piece for the Law Gazette and Joshua Rozenberg’s article for the Guardian). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
We have a problem when it comes to stopping mass surveillance. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:12 am by Susan Brenner
Congress adopted the SCA to provide some protection for stored data; as I noted in my earlier post, some say it is outside the 4th Amendment under the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]