Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Jim Sedor
The report said Kamins violated the judicial code of ethics by advising Hynes on his campaign, offering legal advice, and discussing matters the district attorney’s office was actively prosecuting. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Picking and choosing among the limited empirical record, he insisted that the best data shows that arbitration is better for consumers, and called for further research into the matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
But even some of Puckett’s most prominent critics expressed mixed feelings about a federal inquiry into a matter that many considered unseemly but not criminal. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 9:10 am
  Nevertheless, on the day the merger became effective, dialing the prefix "101" got you the Seattle office no matter what equipment you were on. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Tom Goldstein
That category approach means that defamation can now be regarded as high-value speech, even when it is false, so long as it deals with matters of public interest and concern. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
Nugent 13-862Issue: (1) Whether it was clearly established in 2008 that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he uses a Taser to electroshock a person eight times, where that person is already handcuffed and poses no threat to anyone’s safety and no risk of flight but does not comply with the officer’s orders to stand up; (2) whether, on a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party bears the burden of disproving the moving party’s affirmative defense… [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 8:51 am
Therefore, I choose to enjoy the optimism in my fellow Americans, no matter how ridiculous it is. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
Breyer points out that “the distinction matters in this case,” because a trial court instructed a jury that it did not need to find that the defendant, Hamid Rehaif, knew he was an alien in this country unlawfully. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
That’s a question of intent, and intent doesn’t matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:45 pm by AdamSmith1776
The points to note about these statements, carefully crafted as they are, are that (a) no mention is made of New York; and everyone knows that the (b) the fundamental strength of the combination remains in litigation and not transactional matters. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
“The conditions for entry of every alien, the particular classes of aliens that shall be denied entry altogether, the basis for determining such classification, the right to terminate hospitality to aliens, [and] the grounds on which such determination shall be based, have been recognized as matters solely for the responsibility of the Congress,” wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in Harisiades v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The prospective proscriptions on Budlove's social media communications are, for example, not confined to constitutionally unprotected speech such as "fighting words," "those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction"; "true threats," "those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
This approach accords with the view of every Court of Appeals to consider the matter, save the court below. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
So even if Texas were required to permit racial slurs on specialty plates (a matter about which I’m not sure – perhaps Texas, because of its history concerning race, has a strong interest in separating itself from any racist message that, if attributed to the state, might raise equal protection problems), the present case is different: the Confederate battle flag is worse in this regard than a racial slur; it is akin to a racial slur that was adopted and previously used as a… [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am by Wystan Ackerman
In those circuits that have not recognized ascertainability as such, however, the need for minitrials still matters, and the defendant can make largely the same type of argument under Rule 23(b)(3), due process and the Rules Enabling Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:01 am
Or perhaps, and it is painful to write this, it could have been a matter of the clerk having been a student in a course taught by someone who was not careful with words, who conflated "allowed" and "allowable," or who left the students on their own to learn the technical language issues while class time was devoted to tax theory, tax policy, and discussions of what the tax law could or should be rather than what it is.Could the Supreme Court have intended that the word… [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:09 am by Beatrice Yahia
In a joint letter to the president, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said it was a “dangerous” move that would embolden Israel’s enemies. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
It was an Effexor suicide case, and the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims entirely because it concluded as a matter of law that the FDA would have rejected the warning label proposed by the plaintiffs. [read post]