Search for: "In re Faith S."
Results 6081 - 6100
of 11,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
There was a severe industrial re-entrenchment - redundancy, high unemployment. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:20 pm
Very few people hear God’s call and for those who want to establish a new church, you should be aware that it involves strategic planning. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
In re Actos Litigation, No. 11 L 010011, slip op. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:15 am
I've updated the listings of events at www.irishlaw.org/events/.Four Courts CC BY ncareyHere's the current listing:25-26 April 2014:Law Society Annual Conference 2014 - Dromoland Castle, Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
We’re not done yet. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
Aereo Inc., about the legality of the upstart Aereo’s plan of taking broadcast signals using tiny antennas and offering its customers live TV signals over the Internet without paying re-transmission fees to broadcasters These well-dressed members of the telecommunications bar will be tapping their Gucci loafers a little longer than they expected before getting to that case. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
If we’re going to treat it as an ethical issue, then the ethics of the person involved must be what’s at stake. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
In re. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
While this case is returning to the Competition Tribunal this fall for re-determination, the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision is thought to generally mean a broader basis for abuse of dominance based challenges of trade and other associations in Canada. ____________________ DISCLAIMER: The foregoing is not intended as legal advice and does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
Some might speculate that because they’re cops, they will receive special treatment by the prosecutors and courts, and that may be the case but it’s purely speculative at this point. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
The conventional answers to this, or largely the conventional answers, are usually something along the following lines: violation of competition/antitrust laws can lead to severe penalties: in Canada criminal fines of up to $25 million and/or imprisonment for up to 14 years; directors and officers have duties of good faith and care to their organizations, including obligations to comply with applicable laws; a competition law investigation or civil challenge can be very prejudicial to a… [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
This was attempted in the In Re: G-I Holdings case cited above. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
” But was there only a “bare allegation of bad faith” in this case? [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
This won’t persuade David Bernstein, but one opinion I had forgotten about was Black’s dissent in In Re Anastaplo. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The breach was a violation of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
” (citing In Re Trados Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:33 am
It remains to be seen whether the Kaplan decision will cause the EEOC to re-evaluate its aggressive position on the use of background checks. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:10 am
It’s faith. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:43 am
The problem here is that we’re talking about a warrant to seize emails. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 1:23 pm
This report has already been debated over and over, so I don’t want to re-litigate the issue. [read post]
