Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 8,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm
The two are distinct, and copyright lays no claim to ideas. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
By most measures, her work combined technical insight, which pleased lawyers, with accessible prose, which pleased lay readers. [read post]
Why Virginia will not be invited to the dance (the Supreme Court battle over the individual mandate)
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 pm
See, e.g., Watt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Concepcion and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:48 pm
Part V - Compliance: lays out the compliance requirements for both this standard, as well as for the Customer Service Standard. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
See Time, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
The judge, Justice Bennett, considered the application utilising the principles laid down by Gummow and Hayne JJ in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 at [65], quoting Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 at 622-623 (per Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Owen JJ), and accordingly asked whether the plaintiff had: (1) made out a prima facie case; and (2) addressed where the balance of convenience lay? [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Dominic Choate v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 11:56 pm
’ At present Article 35.5 of the Constitution lays down the absolute principle that “The remuneration of a judge shall not be reduced during his continuance in office”. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Your Curmudgeon takes pride in his attention to details -- and he does not like being misled. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
Labor Board v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:34 am
In law, witnesses essentially fall into two categories: expert and lay witnesses. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
Robert Bosch v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:56 pm
(2) Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The Illinois Court of Appeals found this tape to be inadmissible, holding that the state failed to lay adequate foundation for the reliability of the process used to transfer from the video camera's DVR to the method in which it was displayed in the court room.It seems that every state has its own test to determine the foundational requirements for the admissibility of silent witness items, but they all seem to primarily focus on a witness establishing the reliability of the… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
Brown Marine Services - Laying the Seeds This Lollie v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
In Michael Channette v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:44 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
