Search for: "Municipal Court"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 17,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 11:27 am
” It should be an interesting year in Nebraska bankruptcy court for 2017. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:27 am
” It should be an interesting year in Nebraska bankruptcy court for 2017. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
The purpose of the lawsuit, filed in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, was to stop Philadelphia from collecting the tax. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
” Finally, the Court rejected plaintiffs claim that San Diego Municipal Code § 112.0520(a) independently gave them that appeal right by virtue of its provision that “any person may appeal an environmental determination” not made by the council to the council. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In November, 2013, Tenants filed a complaint in the Cleveland Heights Municipal Court (“trial court”) against Landlords seeking to recover (1) the $1,720 paid for the first month’s rent and security deposit, (2) “an equal amount as damages” and (3) attorney fees and costs. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
In the LLC case, Justice Bucaria granted preliminary injunctive relief in favor of two individuals claiming one-third membership interest each as evidenced by documents provided to a franchisor and municipal agency, notwithstanding an operating agreement naming the adverse party as sole member. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
” An Appeals Court judge has opened the door for the Supreme Judicial Court to revisit common-law liability rules that apply when someone is injured due to a sidewalk defect. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
” An Appeals Court judge has opened the door for the Supreme Judicial Court to revisit common-law liability rules that apply when someone is injured due to a sidewalk defect. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Constitutional/Municipal Law: Division of PowersWindsor (City) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 12:40 pm
If you’re not familiar with the 12(b)(6) standard, courts are required to take all factual allegations made in a complaint as true and can grant a motion to dismiss only if it appears beyond a doubt that there are no facts or circumstances that would entitle the plaintiff to relief. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The published opinion came in an appeal by several municipalities after a trial court denied their motion to dismiss a class action over red light cameras on the grounds of sovereign immunity. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The published opinion came in an appeal by several municipalities after a trial court denied their motion to dismiss a class action over red light cameras on the grounds of sovereign immunity. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The Eleventh Circuit ruled Wednesday that because it has held sovereign immunity does not protect Florida municipalities and state agencies from being sued, they cannot immediately appeal rulings that reject sovereign immunity as a defense, paving the way for more municipalities to have to face court in federal cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
However, the fact that the Veteran ended up incarcerated does mean that the federal, state, or municipal government will be footing the bill for a lot of the Veteran’s care and therefore the VA is relieved of some of its duty to provide. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
However, the fact that the Veteran ended up incarcerated does mean that the federal, state, or municipal government will be footing the bill for a lot of the Veteran’s care and therefore the VA is relieved of some of its duty to provide. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm
Kopp filed a lawsuit in the Sacramento Superior Court seeking to invalidate Senate Bill 1107. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
But decisions of the Court are more subtle than that. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:34 am
” The San Antonio Court respectfully disagreed with the Austin Court of Appeals and did not find its reasoning persuasive. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:34 pm
Specifically, the defendant claimed that the court should have determined that municipal zoning boards have the authority to place temporal restrictions on special exception uses; erroneously concluded that Connecticut’s Liquor Control Act, General Statutes § 30-1 et seq., divested the defendant of its power to attach conditions limiting the hours of operation of restaurants that serve alcohol, and erroneously concluded that the challenged condition was not integral to… [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 2:21 pm
Municipal court defendants with eligible offenses should take immediate advantage of this procedure. [read post]
