Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 6081 - 6100 of 23,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Louis J. Virelli III
My study was limited to adjudicative proceedings in which an evidentiary hearing—written or oral—was required by law. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:00 pm by Kristyn Shea
  The Veteran appealed for a higher rating and eventually attended a Board hearing in November 2011. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Mesa, 17-1678, involving the liability of American law-enforcement officers who allegedly wrongfully shoot across the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters and Suzanne Monyak of Law360 cover the Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday to hear oral argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
He announced that the special counsel’s office was formally closing, that its investigation was complete, and that he was resigning from the Department of Justice. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:12 am by Geoffrey Paschke
The court of appeals has twice ruled that the border-patrol agent could not be held liable for shooting the teen. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
Under a previous Board of Immigration Appeals decision, Matter of X-K-, asylum seekers who were apprehended crossing irregularly and had established credible fear were eligible for bond hearings. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:00 am
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals remanded the Veteran’s claim in March 2016 in order to afford him a hearing, which took place in December of that year. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner elected to appeal the determination to the CSC and, after a hearing, on August 20, the CSC affirmed the appointing officer's determination and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner elected to appeal the determination to the CSC and, after a hearing, on August 20, the CSC affirmed the appointing officer's determination and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner elected to appeal the determination to the CSC and, after a hearing, on August 20, the CSC affirmed the appointing officer's determination and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
The case here formally began with an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding before the Patent Office’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the abortion case, without hearing arguments. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:26 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The disciplinary hearing found Sears guilty of disobeying orders and went with the officers’ version of the incident in which they stated he charged the officers, striking them with his fists before the officers were able to subdue him. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:23 am by Public Employment Law Press
Imposing a disciplinary penaltyImmunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearingsInability to get along with co-workersIndividual’s lacked remorse considered a factor in setting a disciplinary penaltyInitiating disciplinary actionInjured police officer allowed to file GML Section 205-e complaintInjury incurred on shift conducting personal business not covered by… [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:23 am by Public Employment Law Press
Imposing a disciplinary penaltyImmunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearingsInability to get along with co-workersIndividual’s lacked remorse considered a factor in setting a disciplinary penaltyInitiating disciplinary actionInjured police officer allowed to file GML Section 205-e complaintInjury incurred on shift conducting personal business not covered by… [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:37 am by Dave
  After that hearing, an L&Q officer conducted a s. 149 PSED assessment, which found that it was appropriate to enforce the possession order. [read post]