Search for: "People v Friend" Results 6081 - 6100 of 7,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Frankfurter received letters from a number of people a number of people praising the appointment and its breaking of the racial barrier. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:25 am by David Lat
Online Surveys & Market Research Wheelchair-bound lawyer ‘molested judge’ (with video) [Banned on the Web] Lawyer: I didn’t mean to touch judge’s butt, my cerebral palsy made me do it [New York Daily News] People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:27 pm
Twitter became an often hilarious watercooler network of Obama VP pick jokes as people frittered away their Friday wondering who it would be. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
Also, have you noticed that Hood has had very little to nothing to say about the confidential settlement in the State Farm v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:55 am by Vikram Raghavan
An idol is not a precondition for a “deity” to exist in Hindu theology and jurisprudence, the deity can in the words of the Supreme Court in Ram Janki Deity v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am by MTTLR Blog Editor
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best in his dissent in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:52 pm by Tessa Shepperson
That fortunate band of people who can afford to live in London. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
Our friend Professor Adam Levitin at Georgetown Law Center sent one of us the following message on Twitter a few days ago, questioning whether such an override would have any impact at all: @AlanKaplinsky Trying to puzzle through this. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]