Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 6,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 2:18 pm
An interesting case from the Second Department Tuesday provides some answers - People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 04149. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:46 am
This approach offers a relatively simple answer to one of the most important problems in constitutional theory: How do we explain the evident fact that the structure of our government and the rights of the people have changed pervasively since the Founding, in ways that are simply not reflected in Article V amendments to the canonical text? [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:37 pm
I was asked to speak and write about the class-of-one equal protection case from 2000, Village of Willowbrook v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
To aid in thinking about this question, consider Grutter v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:31 am
Wood v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
"); People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
Highler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
In light of that evidence, termination was not based solely on mental disabilities and termination was in C.V.'s best interests. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
USA v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:41 pm
John McCain, et al., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
Justice Kennedy supports abortion rights (just not unlimited ones) so Roe isn't going anywhere, and 2. there are many people who reject the idea of a Constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the text and history of the Constitution, not based their religion.It's always interesting to watch people talk about the Court, especially lay people. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
Thacker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
Usually, this refers to people who entered the U.S. without being inspected and admitted in legal status by the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
More cross-cultural relationships are developing than ever before, as are more international marriages among people of all socioeconomic levels. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
But when Sole v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
Pataki QUEENS COUNTYFamily LawWife Granted Divorce, Entitled to Sole Possession Of Marital Residence for Husband's Abandonment Pritchett v. [read post]
