Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6081 - 6100 of 13,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and will clarify the standard for summoning a special three-judge U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-419Issue: Whether the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant's legitimate, untainted assets (those not traceable to a criminal offense) needed to retain counsel of choice violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
In state post-conviction review, DeBruce’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim went nowhere, and the federal district court denied his habeas petition. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Steven Eversole
The investigation was performed by a taskforce consisting of Gardendale Police, The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office, United States Secret Service, United States Marshals, United States Treasury agents (T Feds), FBI agents, Wal-Mart global security, and other state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Steven Eversole
The investigation was performed by a taskforce consisting of Gardendale Police, The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office, United States Secret Service, United States Marshals, United States Treasury agents (T Feds), FBI agents, Wal-Mart global security, and other state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. [read post]
On June 1, 2015, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas  issued its decision in Associated Builders & Contractors of Tex., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by MBettman
Justice Frankfurter’s concurrence found that the Eighth and Fifth Amendments were not applicable to states, a position that has since been rejected. ) United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
The Petition Should Be Granted Because the Decision Below Is Inconsistent with This Court’s Precedent A. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Motorola Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]