Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 6081 - 6100 of 7,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
Chase believed the 14th Amendment barred such discrimination by a state. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am by Richard Hunt
That left the state law claims in the wrong court, so the case was remanded to the state court. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
  This inaction is consistent with the United States’ decision in 2005 to withdraw the Untied States’ accession to jurisdiction of the [World Court] with regard to matters arising under the Convention. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
The usual culinary suspects would be rounded up and would cost the consumer more, thus providing a disincentive to purchase the item. [14]. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Simon Lester
  Its architecture, which the Bretton Woods consensus established six decades ago, is based largely on a “state-to-state” framework. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:12 am by Simon Lester
We welcome, however, quality proposals on any international economic law topic.       * The role of epistemic communities in financial law: closed clubs v. continually evolving centers of change;      * The legitimacy and accountability of private norm-setters; * Room for private actors in international organizations: how the Bretton Woods institutions and the G20 can (or should) reach out beyond states; * Are developing… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  When the court on Tuesday took up the high-profile case of Gill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  The rules will almost certainly continue to be defined on a state-by-state basis and, if recent developments are any indication, the scales seem to be tipping in workers’ favor. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  The rules will almost certainly continue to be defined on a state-by-state basis and, if recent developments are any indication, the scales seem to be tipping in workers’ favor. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:47 am by randywallace
The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down the case of Hardy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Let’s round out the week’s old business with a trio of habeas cases from the Sixth Circuit. [read post]