Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 6081 - 6100 of 8,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 11:03 am by Kurt Holzer
And they put at risk not only the rights of . . . every person living in this country. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Singer: Setting is controversial uses of patents in areas where patents are controversial for other reasons, like biotech and reproductive rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That means distribution, reproduction, communication to the public; exceptions to the design right must meet the exceptions tests. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Has to go beyond levies to recognize reproduction right’s change in the digital environment. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But now there may be a reproduction in the computer’s RAM, a reproduction to change devices, etc. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:27 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Some of these concerns include affirmative action policy, voting rights, marriage equality and reproductive rights. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:00 pm by Lucie Guibault
The mandatory collective administration of rights is not uncommon in France: the rights of cable retransmission (based on the requirements of the Cable and Satellite Directive), the public lending right and the right of reproduction by means of reprography are also exercised in this fashion. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by Legal Talk Network
Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Attorney Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy for Concerned Women for America and Attorney Gretchen Borchelt, Senior Counsel for Health and Reproductive Rights for the National Women’s Law Center, to discuss current legislation aimed at women's issues, reaction from women’s groups and the present state of women's rights. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Please join me as I welcome Attorney Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy for Concerned Women for America and Attorney Gretchen Borchelt, Senior Counsel for Health and Reproductive Rights for the National Women's Law Center, to discuss current legislation aimed at women's issues, reaction from women's groups and the present state of women's rights. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:52 pm by David Oxenford
  The last time such a deal was reached on the mechanical royalty, there were objections raising the questions of whether services like on-demand streams really implicated the reproduction right at all, or whether these kinds of services should only pay the PROs. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:26 am by paperstreet
The “fact” being an unauthorized reproduction and display of copyrighted material owned by someone other than the user posting material on the provider’s website. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:22 pm by Derek Bambauer
He noted that Paramount wants to give fair use “a wide berth,” and that their core concerns are about commercial-scale violations of the reproduction right – full downloads of their films, not uses of clips and such. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:44 am by Tonya Gisselberg
The Second Circuit rejected the district court’s interpretation that that right and ability to control requires specific knowledge because that interpretation would make §512(c)(1)(B) duplicative of §512(c)(1)(A). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:24 am by djackson
Posted by:  Judy Waxman, Vice President for Health and Reproductive Rights Do you think our nation’s leaders would allow a hospital to refuse to perform an emergency abortion on a woman – even if it means she would die? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:22 am by boston
Dolan and Land want their theology to determine government national policy on reproductive issues, marriage equality and the civil rights of LGBT people. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In 2007, Viacom sued YouTube for copyright infringement because of unauthorized public performance, display, and reproduction of their works on the video site. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:54 pm by Charles Bieneman
” The plaintiffs sued YouTube and Google, alleging “direct and secondary copyright infringement based on the public performance, display, and reproduction of approximately 79,000 audiovisual ‘clips’ that appeared on the YouTube website between 2005 and 2008. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by christopher
WARNING: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. [read post]