Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
As the Master of the Rolls indicated in the now infamous paragraph 168 of his judgment in the same case, some MI5 officials: appear to have a dubious record relating to actual involvement [in the mistreatment of detainees], and frankness about any such involvement, with the mistreatment of Mr Mohamed when he was held at the behest of US officials. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:39 am by centerforartlaw
Suggested Readings Milton Esterow, The Battle for Picasso’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Empire Vanity Fair (2016) Frida Kahlo Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:39 am by centerforartlaw
Suggested Readings Milton Esterow, The Battle for Picasso’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Empire Vanity Fair (2016) Frida Kahlo Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Aaron Mackey
The intent was to roll back Section 230 in order to make it easier for victims of trafficking to sue certain websites, such as Backpage.com. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
A Passing Opportunity to Break Bad Contracts The copyright termination time bomb is ticking away. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
A Fleeting Opportunity to Terminate Publishing Contracts They say that with every  contract, the truth is in the details. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Then suppose that just as the government is about to roll out the vaccines to the general public, a gravedigger  brings a lawsuit against the federal Department of Health and Human Services and administrators complaining that the expenditure of funds to provide free vaccines exceeds the scope of congressional authorizations. [read post]