Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
None of the correspondence explicitly referred to the mediation as binding, as stated in Section 3.3.3. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am by Ion Meyn
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am by Stephanie Pell
During the question-and-answer session of Nakasone’s testimony, he explained that U.S. adversaries are launching attacks from inside the country using U.S. infrastructure. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Hamilton certainly knows better.This chart shows the violent crime rate in the United States from 1990 to 2022. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
  All of this cooperation is to be undertaken at the state to state level--no people to people focus here (Ibid., Art. 4). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Kyle Persaud
This is only a small number of the laws that the legislature actually passed this session. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Kyle Persaud
This is only a small number of the laws that the legislature actually passed this session. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am by CMS
The Lord Advocate also addresses the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session in Keatings v Advocate General.3 That case was raised by a pro-independence campaigner who asked the Court of Session to provide several declarators that the Scottish Parliament was able to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm by Bill Marler
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]