Search for: "Samsung" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited of Taiwan and Samsung Electronics Company Limited of South Korea as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:39 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(collectively “Samsung”) motion for summary determination of non-infringement of U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
Comcast P2P settlement now final (ArsTechnica)   US Patents Bilski and software patents (Spicy IP)   US Patents – Decisions District Court N D Illinois grants motion to dismiss in false marking case: Simonian v Cisco Systems (Gray on Claims)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Infineon Technologies - ALJ Essex grants motion to terminate investigation in certain dynamic random access memory semiconductors (337-TA-707) (ITC Law Blog) Motorola - ALJ Gildea grants… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm by Duncan
Comcast P2P settlement now final (ArsTechnica) US Patents Bilski and software patents (Spicy IP) US Patents – Decisions District Court N D Illinois grants motion to dismiss in false marking case: Simonian v Cisco Systems (Gray on Claims) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Infineon Technologies – ALJ Essex grants motion to terminate investigation in certain dynamic random access memory semiconductors (337-TA-707) (ITC Law Blog) Motorola – ALJ Gildea grants motion… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:48 pm
High-level executives from oil and gas, oil financing and government sectors, supermajor IOCs, big NOCs, INOCs, SOCs including ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Total, Hess, Samsung, Petronas, PTT, Pertamina, Medco, major law firms, and teams from Indonesian regulators in the ESDM and BPMIGAS attended the forum. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Respondents Synology Inc. and Synology America Corporation to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by blaisemouttet
This method from Samsung teaches using fullerene material as an inactivation layer to mask portions of the catalytic metal and control the areas where nanotubes are grown. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:01 pm by Heather Young
Samsung, for example, paid a $300 million fine following claims of price fixing involving Dynamic Random Access Memory chips (DRAM). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm by law shucks
Related posts:Lawyers on the Samsung-Rambus Settlement Virtual Lawyer Searches for, Finds Love at Google New Arrivals Settle Long-Running Patent Dispute [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:20 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The complaint states that “[b]ecause the [Samsung] chips are below 38nm in dimension, the Samsung NAND flash devices in the Apple iPad necessarily infringe the ‘998 patent. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  On May 26, 2010, the Commission issued an additional notice requesting further briefing on the impact of a license between Rambus and Samsung on the ALJ’s finding and conclusions. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Respondent Appro International, Inc. to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:33 am by Frank Pasquale
The first such floating castle has been christened the “Utopia”–the South Korean firm Samsung has been contracted to build the $1.1 billion ship, due to be launched in 2013. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Samsung Electronics Am., Inc., 989 F.2d 1512, 1518 (9th Cir. 1993) (Kozinski, J., dissenting from the order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc). [read post]