Search for: "State v House"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 28,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
:I wanted to update you on a recent court decision relating to the rules on lawyer advertising recently adopted by the Appellate Divisions.In Alexander v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:58 am
At the same time, recent state court decisions in Harris v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 1:07 pm
The measure goes a step further than the Supreme Court’s ruling (Bostock v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:21 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:21 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, in which the Court granted review to consider whether disparate impact claims are available under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In the National Review, Hans von Spakovsky and Elizabeth Slattery discuss Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
In Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:14 am
Sebastiampillai v Parr. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Islam & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Haringey (2022) EWHC 3933 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Haringey’s refusal to award Mr Islam Band A priority on its housing register, rather than Band B. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
In Campbell II, the Supreme Court held that the state's method of adjusting salaries in areas with a higher cost of living had to include the cost of housing. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
In Campbell II, the Supreme Court held that the state's method of adjusting salaries in areas with a higher cost of living had to include the cost of housing. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
Kankanton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
(Kelly v. [read post]
