Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6081 - 6100
of 29,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
That complaint was rejected on the ground, inter alia, that, in Decision 2000/520 (‘the Safe Harbour Decision’), the Commission had found that the United States ensured an adequate level of protection. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:47 am
In R v Kal Tire, 2020 ABCA 200 (CanLII), the Alberta Court of Appeal clarified the law on an employer’s defence of due diligence when charged with an occupational health and safety violation. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
The Committee also does not discuss recent precedent, such as NIFLA v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
In Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Dear Readers:Just recently, the Eleventh Circuit largely overturned the District Court’s decision in US and State of Florida ex re Ruckh v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
v=WiIRVm9bC48) About the Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) from the association website: Since 1986, AFDO unites high-level regulatory officials, industry representatives, trade associations, academia and consumer organizations. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm
This risk is only heightened — particularly for those operating in California — following a slew of recent decisions, including one from the California Court of Appeals just last month in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:48 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
Rather, it is a matter of determining which level of government, within the Canadian constitutional order, holds the power to legislate on the subject. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Class V Stockholders Litigation, case number 2018-0816, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Rambling RooftopsWatson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
” Citing Clinton and United States v. [read post]
