Search for: "State v. Money" Results 6081 - 6100 of 20,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:18 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: It’s time for action on Social Security disability insurance, May 6, 2016, The Hill, By Jim McCrery and Earl Pomeroy More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
For state candidates running with subsidies, the ruling means that they will be eligible for only one third of the amount of public money that they had been eligible to receive. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  Perhaps the most famous probate litigation case ever, Marshall v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Kindred Nursing Centers v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm by Walter James
Cody Tuma the stated that his ability to lie has changed since is religious experience. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
Here's the money portion of that discussion from Judge Bybee:"The physical evidence bearing on this question didn't amount to a hill of beans. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a Tenth Amendment case, drew notice from David Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, and Crime & Consequences. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]