Search for: "States v. State"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 258,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the necessary mechanisms to ensure compliance with the White v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:19 am
Procedurally, the Internet Archive lawsuit was filed as an intervention into a similar suit, Backpage.com v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:05 am
Here are the updated materials in State of Washington v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in Detroit International Bridge Company v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:17 am
State of Connecticut Dept. of Banking (Conn. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm
Cambridge University Press v Becker, decided March 17, 2011. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Supp. 86 (SDNY), in which Judge Mottley ruled that the Yankees ARE a state actor, relying on the Supreme Court's 1961 opinion in Burton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.… [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm
On Thursday, a 2-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India delivered a split judgment in the case of Aishat Shifa v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an individual knew the alleged offending conduct was prohibited… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
Here: State Opening Brief Counties Amicus Brief Union Amicus Brief Answer Brief Tribal Amicus Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:54 pm
., asking it to review the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in Spoerle v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Payton v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Earlier this month, the SCOTUS granted cert in Pivotal Software v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:46 pm
State Senate required to provide employee payroll records in response to a Freedom of Information Law requestMatter of Polokoff-Zakarin v Boggess, 62 AD3d 1141Penny Polokoff-Zakarin filed a Freedom of Information [FOIL] request seeking documents concerning an employee of the State Senate, including the individual’s date of employment and date of termination of employment, the title or position of employment held, the salary paid, and “complete time and… [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 11:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Shep Melnick, is "The Administrative State in Action: Lessons from Title IX. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:03 pm
In State v. [read post]
