Search for: "US Security Associates Inc" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
Law and LiteratureKFP81 .P4 No.594310,000 stages of an endless cause : what literature tells us about lawyers and the practice of law. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am by Jan von Hein
As Greek law, in order to secure the rights of the child, provides that a prosecutor is a party to the proceedings, the ECJ held that the acceptance of the prosecutor is necessary. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  When applied to the Christian Legal Society, that requirement implicates the group’s freedom of association rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:07 am
  On April 24, 2005, Kidwell, the general counsel of Sybaritic, Inc. sent an e-mail, titled “A Difficult Duty,” to Sybaritic’s managers. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
The recent economic troubles have actually increased Slack to some degree, as some associates have managed to turn "deferral" into something positive. [read post]
Are nursing sled dog puppies sufficiently controlled if left at their mother's teat and the mother herself is securely tethered? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
The recent economic troubles have actually increased Slack to some degree, as some associates have managed to turn "deferral" into something positive. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:12 am by Mandelman
PulteGroup Inc., up 4.7 percent at $9.07, led the home builders’ index higher. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the "date of hire" might not necessarily be the same date used to determine an individual's service for seniority purposes for layoff under State law, i.e., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the "date of hire" might not necessarily be the same date used to determine an individual's service for seniority purposes for layoff under State law, i.e., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the "date of hire" might not necessarily be the same date used to determine an individual's service for seniority purposes for layoff under State law, i.e., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]