Search for: "Walkes v. State" Results 6081 - 6100 of 7,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Camuso‘s holding is reminiscent of Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272 [2018]. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The ruling is made that much worse because the Court had before it an example of how the situation should have been handled, in the case of NCTQ v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) USTR releases ACTA summary (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) Court of Appeals for the… [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dickerson’s opinion also drew support from a 2004 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in Anastos v Sable in which that court upheld application of a minority discount to the valuation of the partnership interest of a partner who wrongfully dissolved the partnership under that state’s statute equivalent to New York Partnership Law § 69. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
Having spent a blustery evening walking along the South Bank on Wednesday, a frigid journey from Farringdon to Holborn on Thursday, and a freezing walk in Marylebone on Saturday, the AmeriKat herself is still nursing frozen paw pads and refuses to go outside once more. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]