Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
id=62ac2fc048370f4c2c31b714 ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS: https://conlinpa.com/2016/04/03/hyman-v-daoud/ As you might gather, you can't stop people from writing about you by registering your name as a trademark. [* * *] Here's that post from last week: I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
The counterattack comes as the Iraqi army has been moving troops around Mosul ahead of the expected push to retake its western half in a decisive battle for the whole city. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
All of this makes Reinvigorating the right to development: A vision for the future a fascinating read as well as a harbinger of the battles that will be fought--again pitting forces which view each other as incarnations of evil and themselves as good. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
The bill would also "correct" the decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Richard Serra v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
On June 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Walker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:41 am
In D.A. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
These battle-hardened rabble-rousers were dubbed “COINdinistas,” a tribute to the figurative insurgency they launched in order to teach the U.S. government how to fight literal insurgencies. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
The “confusion test” – Sections 12(1)(d) and 16(3)(a) and (b) Section 12(1)(d) states that a mark is registrable if it is not confusing with a registered trademark; sections 16(3)(a) and (b) very similarly provided that a mark must not be confusing with a trademark that had previously been know or applied for. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
This second purpose is expressly stated in the law: Article 6. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:19 am
Doninger v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
