Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 7,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The appellant, who had four dependent children with her deceased partner, but had never married him, argued that this requirement discriminated against the survivor and/or the children on the basis of their marital or birth status, contrary to ECHR, art 14. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Eoff v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:50 am
In J.L. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Yet public opinion ultimately shifted decisively in favor of same-sex marriage, and in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
On remand, the trial court expanded upon the decision in Harte v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
In the recent case Gatto v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:07 am
Ferguson or Japanese internment camps in Korematsu v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:36 pm
See, e.g., Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:03 am
Third, I disclose that David Souter nearly resigned in protest over Bush v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am
This Arnold & Porter memo explains the facts of this case – Malouf v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:52 am
Rather, Kelly v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Jeanette Turner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
With its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Tharp v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Holton v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:21 pm
In the matter of Smuts v Booyens; Markplaas (Edms) Bpk and Another v Booysens [2001] ZASCA 57 (also 2001 (4) SA 15 (A)) the court held that the word “transfer” consisted of a number of steps within a private company setting: (a) an agreement to transfer, (b) the execution of the transfer document, and (c) registration of transfer. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
” PrawfsBlawg has a follow-up piece on the Court’s recent decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
