Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6101 - 6120 of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 8:57 pm
  Online, Internet search companies and websites will likely refuse advertisements that target Ontario. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 7:25 am by Adam Weinstein
The Commission’s Complaint alleged that from 2009 until mid-2012, BioChemics and others named raised at least $9,000,000 from approximately 70 investors by misrepresenting: (a) that BioChemics had ongoing research and development collaborations with pharmaceutical companies when this was not true; (b) that BioChemics had two drugs currently under FDA review, when this was not true; (c) the status and results of clinical trials for BioChemics’ drugs; and (d)… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  But it also emphasizes a) how relatively irrelevant the IANA function is to that question; b) how dependent we are on search engines; and c) how essential it is that the search engines uses their position as gate-keeper for beneficent purposes. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:09 pm by Melissa Vo
Their presentations will be organized in three panels: (a) public health and human rights at national, regional and national levels; (b) global health security and the protection of human rights; and (c) public health systems and prevention of human rights. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Following a preliminary hearing, the Employment Tribunal found that the Respondents were “workers” and that they were “working” whenever they (a) had the Appellants’ app switched on; (b) were within the territory in which they were authorised to work; and (c) were able and willing to accept assignments. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:38 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
It based its holding on Section 230(c)(2)(b) of the Communications Decency Act based on a determination that the software manufacturer was an “access software provider” and that it had provided a means to restrict the utility of the spyware. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:44 am
YOU ARE 26-32 (please tell me your exact age), and (a) a Christian, (b) know what you want from life (PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE know specifically what you want); (c) are fairly attractive (no need to be a model or a pageant beauty); (d) have COMMON SENSE and Good Values; (e) are ready for a serious, meaningful, long term relationship, friendship, marriage and family; (f) want children; (g) do not have children; (h) are not busy or very busy with work/studies/etc.; have time… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm by joseph bahgat
I probably didn't need to tell you all this, but it gave me an opportunity to (a) take responsibility for a mistake that may have been blamed on my friends and colleagues at LexBlog; (b) remind people why they should avoid godaddy.com; and (c) tell everyone about gandi.net, and one of my favorite organizations—EFF. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:34 am by Bill Raftery
(c) Assist the judiciary in responding to the rapid expansion of information technology in this state. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:20 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Lawyers for dozens of large corporations think it isn’t good for their companies either. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:31 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Category A: Drugs that have been demonstrated no harm on fetuses according to medical studies Categoy B: Drugs believed to be safe for fetuses, but without widespread studies medical studies Category C: Drugs with no information regarding fetus safety Category D: Drugs that pose some harm to fetuses Category X: Drugs that pose a severe risk of harm to fetuses and their is no reason for pregnant woment to take the medication While the impact of drugs and other medications a mother… [read post]