Search for: "Crawford"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 6,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2006, 2:50 am
As mentioned in a previous post, Brooklyn Law School is holding a one-day symposium on Crawford-Davis related issues this Friday. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Lisenko, interestingly, overruled Crawford v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 6:57 am
But we think that more votes should have gone to Heather Meade, Jessica Janov, and Rebekah Crawford. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 11:24 am
Here are some interesting posts from my fellow New York law bloggers from the past week: Indignant Indigent: AD4: Crawford does not apply to... [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 11:11 am
He argued that the admission of this report violated the Confrontation Clause, as interpreted in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 5:38 pm
., Aug 17, 2006), which holds that Crawford applies throughout the sentencing portion of a capital case. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 8:39 am
(See post 81 and post 131)The practical effects of the case were far simpler: Crawford and its follow-up Davis (see post 127) made it far more difficult for the states to prosecute domestic violence and child abuse cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 5:36 am
According to the Atlanta Jrl Constitution here, Professor Jeff Fisher (who represented the defendants in cases such as Blakely and Crawford) and Professor Doug Berman (editor of the Sentencing Law Policy Blog here) have agreed to assist Decatur attorney Mawuli... [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:00 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 10:55 am
Crawford in this week's email edition should have been: APPELLEE, APPELLANT, & REPLY. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
Crawford addresses lethal injection, yet again. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 6:03 pm
Earlier this week, as detailed here, the Arizona Supreme Court decided that Crawford and the Confrontation Clause are inapplicable at the penalty phase of a capital case. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 4:42 am
Crawford suggested that Roberts may still apply to such statements, or that perhaps the Clause poses no obstacle at all to them. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 1:08 am
Street, 471 U.S. 409 (1985), was specifically reaffirmed in Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 8:17 pm
Of course, Crawford didn't announce that goal straight out, but that's what the case really means. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 8:37 am
I previously posted a brief, preliminary summary, prepared by Andrew Fine, of the Supreme Court's decisions after Davis, denying certiorari in some Crawford-related cases involving fresh accusations and GVRing (granting, vacating and reversing for reconsideration in light of Davis) in others. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:09 am
It's a Crawford case decided a month after the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:15 am
Under the ordinary post-Crawford procedure, the issue of unavailability arises only if there has been a prior oportunity for confrontation. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 2:02 pm
Crawford that Missouri had to provide a particular inmate with transportation to an abortion facility and the American Civil Liberties Union ( [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
The COA applied Crawford and Davis and held that a reasonable person in the child's position would believe that the statements might be used prosecutorially and, thus were testimonial.The state also argued that Mr. [read post]
