Search for: "Crawford "
Results 6101 - 6120
of 6,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2006, 8:39 am
(See post 81 and post 131)The practical effects of the case were far simpler: Crawford and its follow-up Davis (see post 127) made it far more difficult for the states to prosecute domestic violence and child abuse cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 5:36 am
According to the Atlanta Jrl Constitution here, Professor Jeff Fisher (who represented the defendants in cases such as Blakely and Crawford) and Professor Doug Berman (editor of the Sentencing Law Policy Blog here) have agreed to assist Decatur attorney Mawuli... [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:00 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 10:55 am
Crawford in this week's email edition should have been: APPELLEE, APPELLANT, & REPLY. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
Crawford addresses lethal injection, yet again. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 6:03 pm
Earlier this week, as detailed here, the Arizona Supreme Court decided that Crawford and the Confrontation Clause are inapplicable at the penalty phase of a capital case. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 4:42 am
Crawford suggested that Roberts may still apply to such statements, or that perhaps the Clause poses no obstacle at all to them. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 1:08 am
Street, 471 U.S. 409 (1985), was specifically reaffirmed in Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 8:17 pm
Of course, Crawford didn't announce that goal straight out, but that's what the case really means. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 8:37 am
I previously posted a brief, preliminary summary, prepared by Andrew Fine, of the Supreme Court's decisions after Davis, denying certiorari in some Crawford-related cases involving fresh accusations and GVRing (granting, vacating and reversing for reconsideration in light of Davis) in others. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:09 am
It's a Crawford case decided a month after the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:15 am
Under the ordinary post-Crawford procedure, the issue of unavailability arises only if there has been a prior oportunity for confrontation. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 2:02 pm
Crawford that Missouri had to provide a particular inmate with transportation to an abortion facility and the American Civil Liberties Union ( [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
The COA applied Crawford and Davis and held that a reasonable person in the child's position would believe that the statements might be used prosecutorially and, thus were testimonial.The state also argued that Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 4:30 am
Brooklyn Law School, under the leadership of Bob Pitler, ran an excellent symposium on Crawford in February 2005. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 7:55 am
North Carolina, were appeals from state supreme court decisions holding such statements to be nontestimonial under Crawford. [read post]
27 Jun 2006, 4:12 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:59 am
We rejected that argument (and our prior cases that had accepted it) in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2006, 6:42 pm
Given that SCOTUS has taken a Crawford retroactivity case, that seemed a risky strategy.It will be interesting to see if the Colorado Supreme Court waits until after Burton to decide Johnson. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 12:26 pm
Indiana) Nos. 05-5224 & 05-5705 (June 19, 2006), the Court held that, for purposes of determining whether a statement is "testimonial" and therefore covered by the Confrontation Clause rights recognized in Crawford, statements are nontestimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objectively indicating that the primary purpose of interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. [read post]
