Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 28,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 12:44 pm
M.G.L.A. 152 § 1(1). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The appellant filed a petition for writ of mandate and argued that the project did not qualify for the infill exemption because (1) the 12-acre project site listed in the original documents exceeded the project size criterion available under the exemption, and (2) the project fell within the scope of the unusual circumstances exception. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Therefore, the ALJ confirmed her August 22, 2006 decision and found that the District's June 12, 2003 memorandum to current employees rescinding receipt of that benefit upon retirement violated its duty to negotiate under §209-a.1(d) of the Act. [read post]
Announcing the Fourth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman
7 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
What Does the Book Cover? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
The Quaker Oats company filed a motion to have the case dismissed under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff lacks standing, and under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The appellant filed a petition for writ of mandate and argued that the project did not qualify for the infill exemption because (1) the 12-acre project site listed in the original documents exceeded the project size criterion available under the exemption, and (2) the project fell within the scope of the unusual circumstances exception. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:52 am
Offer expires 12/1/10. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:11 pm
Reasoning that the purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) is to test a sufficiency of a complaint and not to resolve contests regarding facts, the merits of a claim, or the applicability of defenses, the Court denied Equity's motion.A Rule 12(b)(6) motion should not be granted unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim which would entitled plaintiff to relief, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 5:10 pm
Chili’s, Oahu, Kapolei (590 Farrington Highway), July 10, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, and 27, 2016 Hawaiian Airlines, July 1-26, 2016 and July 31-August 1, August 10-12 Hokkaido Ramen Santouka, Oahu, Honolulu (801 Kaheka Street), July 21-23, 26-30, and August 2-6, 9-11, 2016 Sushi Shiono, Hawaii, Waikoloa Beach Resort, Queen’s MarketPlace (69-201 Waikoloa Beach Drive), July 5-8,… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
This list does not indicate these businesses are sources of this outbreak; at this time, no infections have been linked to exposure to these businesses. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
So far as cl.22 is concerned, it substantially replicates s.12 of the Human Right Act 1998 (‘HRA’), which is to be repealed along with the rest of the HRA on the enactment of the Bill: see cl.1(1) & Sch.5, para.2. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
An important question in this case, as the Second Circuit noted, is the quantity of protective filings that can be expected if American Pipe does not apply to Section 13’s three-year limitations period in Section 11 and 12 cases. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:41 am
§ 40-1-100(12)(A) of the Georgia Motor Carrier Act, nor does it exempt these companies from the Act’s definition of motor carrier. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
Standards level 1 lists 10 proscribed behaviors for kindergarten through grade 5 and 12 for grades 6 through 12, which include the Cell Phone Rules. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:10 am
Tier 1: A company can raise up to $20 million in any 12-month period under a Tier 1 offering. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:31 pm
Schedule difficulty beyond Division I-A FBS does not show a linear decrease - it is more than that. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
" 12-60 Moore's Federal Practice-Civil § 60.41. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 6:17 am
Doe (SD, filed 1/7/2022) – The lawsuit was dismissed by the Plaintiff on February 24, 2022. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:53 am
The withdrawal does not affect other Dole products. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The board further notes that R 137(2) does not apply, as an amended set of claims had already been filed with a letter dated 17 September 2003. [read post]
