Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 6,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
He had, prior to this year, achieved a degree of respect and recognition as one of the most important and influential African-American ministers in the U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 5:58 pm
See § 3-308; Cortex v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
For the record, my opinions here track closely to my view of the convergence issue between the United States and Europe: too much deference to different theoretical priors without respectfully hashing out how those priors hold up to available evidence. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause… [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
§ 455 and Canons 3C(1) and 3D of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:18 pm
Today the Connecticut Supreme Court overturned the state's ban on same-sex marriage in Kerrigan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
The United States presented no r other evidence to controvert that offered by Knellinger. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:29 pm
United States, 2008 WL 4151665 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:49 pm
Facts In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
First, a possible solution is the application of the Coase Theorem, which is well-known to lawyers through its application in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co., 42 NY2d 884, 885, quoting 30 NY Jur, Insurance, § 1099, p 484 [emphasis added]; see Agoado Realty Corp. v United Intl. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:16 pm
See also Koon v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
In fact in United States v. [read post]
