Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 93,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 10:36 am
Patrick v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:02 pm
The key word in today’s argument in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Kubiak v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:26 pm
Styers v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Compare, e.g., the Doe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:15 am
" The State Court of Appeals said that in Albunio v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:00 am
On October 29, 2024 in Dawson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:17 am
The FLSA does not mention a right to seek indemnity. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:31 pm
The question arose out of Ramos v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:23 am
The California Supreme Court’s opinion in Howard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
by Kenneth Anderson Over at Lawfare, UVA professor Paul Stephan talks about the ICJ decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Hilton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Hilton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm
As stated in McCormick v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court refused to defend Roe v. [read post]
