Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6101 - 6120 of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm by PJ Blount
(a) Definitions- In this title, the following definitions apply: (1) ADVANCED QUALIFICATION PROGRAM- The term `advanced qualification program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-54A, dated June 23, 2006, including any subsequent revisions thereto [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
IPSO 17284-23 MacMillan v spectator.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach, after investigation 16423-23 Green v The Sunday Times, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 15588-23 Palin v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 9 Reporting of crime (2021, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 17771-23… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
The mere coincidence in time does not make the two wounds a single harm, or the conduct of the two defendants one tort. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Jessica A. Huse
On June 23, 2021, after five years of litigation, on remand from the Ninth Circuit’s decision, the Central District of California granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Domino’s violated the ADA because its website was not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Jessica A. Huse
On June 23, 2021, after five years of litigation, on remand from the Ninth Circuit’s decision, the Central District of California granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Domino’s violated the ADA because its website was not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Jessica A. Huse
On June 23, 2021, after five years of litigation, on remand from the Ninth Circuit’s decision, the Central District of California granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Domino’s violated the ADA because its website was not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
Hearing at Crete on June 23, 2005. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm by justia.admin
The bill does not allow the courts to look at whether the supervisor actually did its job under the circumstances, or whether the supervisor reviewed the substance of the decision. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Does 1-18 (Internet Cases) Hotfile – Warner betrays Hotfile, Hotfile sues for fraud (Public Knowledge) Oracle – Judge throws out Google’s summary judgment on copyright almost entirely (FOSS Patents) Righthaven – Lawyer wants US Marshals to seize copyright troll’s bank account (ArsTechnica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit finds web host liable for its customers’ trademark infringement: Louis Vuitton… [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am by China Law Blog
Hannibal’s position is more nuanced and part 1 of his paper follows, with part 2 coming up tomorrow. [read post]