Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 6101 - 6120 of 12,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2016, 5:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
(c) This section does not: (1) make available as a defense an immaterial misrepresentation; or (2) affect the provisions of Section 705.004. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
Ruth Ann Morgan, an 8-page opinion, Judge Mathias writes:At issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the Tipton Circuit Court erroneously joined the Appellants as defendants in a will contest under Indiana Code section 29-1-7-17. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am by Gene Quinn
Briefs of amici curiae will be entertained, and any such amicus briefs may be filed without leave of court but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:49 am by Bill Marler
A total of 10 people infected with several strains of Listeria were reported from 4 states: Arizona (1), Kansas (5), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 2:00 am by Paul M. Hamburger, Proskauer Rose LLP
Technically, the rule does not mean that all the COBRA periods start over from “day 1” after the end of the outbreak period. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Does this instruction extend to non-GAAP financial information that does not relate to the disclosure of target levels, but is nevertheless included in Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) or other parts of the proxy statement — for example, to explain how pay is structured and implemented to reflect the registrant’s or a named executive officer’s performance? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am by Susan Brenner
Andrews conducted three more undercover sessions on January 27, January 29, and February 4, 2003. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:41 am by Jim Sedor
Washington – Lawmakers Grouse about Free Meals RuleTacoma News Tribune – Jordan Schrader | Published: 1/29/2015 Washing [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:43 am by Keith Rizzardi
Table 5: Statute under Which Case Was Brought, Amount Paid, and Number of Payments Paid by Treasury from the Judgment Fund on Behalf of Interior, March 2001 through September 2010 Statute under which case was brought a Attorney fees and costs # of payments Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1540 $21,298,971 b 238 Civil Rights Act Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16 1,243,194 38 Tucker Act (inverse condemnation & other claims), 28 U.S.C. 1491 … [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Thus, we hold that equitable estoppel may, in appropriate cases, bar an employer from arguing that it does not satisfy [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
It said that the 5-hour Energy complaint does not allege an Advertising Injury or any other injury covered by the Policy, and that, even if it did, certain coverage exclusions apply that excuse coverage. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:35 pm
No. 1206/2001 (Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, OJ 2001 No L 174/1), Art. 29 Reg. [read post]