Search for: "High v State"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 35,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm
In their case, Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:04 pm
The employee sued the hospital, asserting various state-law claims and the court, in a prior opinion, held that the state’s high court would likely find that Pennsylvania’s Medical Marijuana Act (MMA) implies a private right of action for employees alleging discrimination under Section 2103(b)(1) and refused to dismiss that claim. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Jeremy Gordon summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Hungary v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
Liu v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
The difference is that the parameters of assessment is guided by the state, and the state reserves for itself the authority to coordinate these systems. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:46 am
Reversing the decision below, the state high court concluded that, analyzed in the context of the case, the division’s interpretation and application of the proxy solicitation regulation was unreasonable because the regulation only governs seeking the execution or non-execution of a proxy. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:06 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
EEOC finally issues proposed rules on permissible incentives in employer-sponsored wellness programs
12 Jan 2021, 5:58 am
Under one view, the court in EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 06-2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:10 am
” The justices did not act on several other high-profile cases, including Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 10:47 am
” But freedom of speech poses no bar to holding a president responsible for his unfounded, bad-faith effort to subvert the results of a free and fair election.Our board — comprised of leading lawyers and activists from every state and the District of Columbia — is a thoughtful, deliberative body of committed civil libertarians. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:59 am
The analysis of these rulings – discussed in Chapter V of this Report – shows that plaintiffs filed a high predominance of cases against employers in “plaintiff-friendly” jurisdictions such as the judicial districts within the Second and Ninth Circuits. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
