Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 6101 - 6120 of 10,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 11:16 pm by tekEditor
Eric Baldeschwieler, aka Eric14, CEO of Hortonworks The email went to Eric14. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by WIMS
      GAO was asked to examine: (1) actions power companies may take in response to these regulations; (2) their potential electricity market and reliability implications; and (3) the extent to which these implications can be mitigated. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:06 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant does not present any evidence in support of this argument, nor does the Court find it necessary to invade the province of the jury. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:53 am by John Palley
 We look for two things before filing a Heggstad: 1) were assets listed on a schedule of assets and 2) was there a general transfer document. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm by Matthew Kolken
 The last policy memorandum issued by John Morton only resulted in a favorable exercise of prosecutorial discretion in 1.9% of all reviewed cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:13 am by Heidi Henson
That policy, at a minimum, will (1) establish a procedure for a disabled employee to ask for an accommodation; (2) provide that if an employee seeks to return to work from a medical leave, JES may only require a medical exam if it is job-related and consistent with business necessity; and (3) provide that if JES receives a doctor’s authorization for a disabled employee to return to work and decides that the authorization is not adequate, it will advise the employee of the… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:35 am by Jonathan Zasloff
This is all true as far as it goes, but it 1) misses the point, and 2) carries some dangerous ideological implications about which environmentalists should be very wary. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
(2) Does the judicial misconduct reflected in the trial record serve as a basis for granting former MSG John Hatley a new trial? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Possibilities: (1) bar any claim of confusion based on copyrighted works (strong form of channeling); (2) bar any claim of confusion arising out of content. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
Third, it argues that the subpoena was an overly broad “John Doe” subpoena. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
And so the Board was unable to assess the impact of Applicant's long use on the purchasing public.In sum, Applicant failed to carry its heavy burden under Section 2(f).TTABlog comment: Compare the Board's analysis here with that in recent Hershey case [TTABlogged here], where the Board was careful in recognizing that although a design may be de facto functional, the details or refinements may not be de jure functional: i.e, the scoring on the Hershey bar has a utilitarian purpose,… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
You’ve seen it applied in everything from a John Wayne western to Star Wars. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:34 am by royblack
The latest was in John Goodman’s trial. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am by John L. Welch
In re Ameritox Ltd., 101 USPQ2d 1081 (TTAB 2011) [precedential].Text Copyright John L. [read post]