Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2018, 9:29 am
Ultimately, the court concluded that the brand-name manufacturer could be held liable under the state’s product liability laws, and it dismissed the defendant manufacturer’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:54 am
Using a toilet apparently does not fall within the ultra-hazardous activity exception to the general rule against holding one liable for the ordinary negligence of one's retained independent contractors. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:12 am
The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because there was no evidence that any of its employees spilled the applesauce that caused the plaintiff’s fall or that it had either actual or constructive notice of the spill. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:12 am
The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because there was no evidence that any of its employees spilled the applesauce that caused the plaintiff’s fall or that it had either actual or constructive notice of the spill. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
The court rejected this argument, however, and cited LeadClick for the proposition that “the key question in determining whether a defendant is liable for developing content is not [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 7:29 pm
Almost 20 years ago, courts decided that Wall Street and other defendants cannot be held liable for ‘aiding and abetting’ in federal securities fraud cases. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:43 am
" The court emphasized that, in so doing, the defendants were liable for "improper means of discovery. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 9:17 am
At the end of last week, the press reported on the jury verdict finding Rolling Stone magazine to be liable for defamation for its story, later retracted, about a gang rape at the University of Virginia. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:23 am
The defendant denies all allegations. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:12 pm
Specifically, even in the absence of agency might a platform provider be liable merely because it “knowingly allowed its client(s) to use that platform for unlawful purposes[?] [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 2:18 pm
The defendant’s appealed the trial court’s denial of summary judgment. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
In Pennsylvania law, the owner’s are not liable for the driver’s neglect unless the driver is employed by the owner. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
" Cotter sued in an effort to obtain a court order directing the school district to provide for his defense and indemnify him should he be held liable for damages.The Supreme Court agreed with the school district and denied Cotter’s petition and dismissed the proceeding. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:01 pm
BETTY WILSON AND VIOLET JOYCE CARTER, AS POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR BETTY WILSON, Appellees. 1st District.Wrongful death -- Medical malpractice -- Trial court did not err in entering summary judgment for defendant University of Miami on claim that University was vicariously liable for negligence of physicians where there had been no pleading that University was vicariously liable for negligence of those physicians -- On motion for summary judgment, trial court considers only… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
That’s California’s rule too. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:52 am
The burden of proof falls to the defendant’s criminal defence lawyers. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:59 am
The insurer then argued in a subsequent motion for summary judgment that the assembler and manufacturer were jointly and severally liable for 100% of the homeowner’s damages. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:44 am
The worker’s direct employer was statutorily immune from liability. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:43 am
’s estate filed a wrongful death claim against the defendant employer, arguing that the employer acted negligently by giving S.S. alcohol and then ushering her out without any further help. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
Notably, the court declined to rule on whether Defendant could be held liable for its alleged actions in the event that Defendant had waived its sovereign immunity. [read post]
