Search for: "Little v State" Results 6101 - 6120 of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
Statisticians amongst you will be delighted to hear that the page count is 34 and the paragraph count a little under 120. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
There have already been a number of blog posts discussing this case, by, among others, PointOfLaw, the ubiquitous LawProfessors, Legalnewsline, Pharmalot, blawgletter, and Jurist.Sure, we're a little slow this time. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 9:07 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Here, with a little help from the state, defendant finds a little more traction. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
In essence, the General Court stated that Roshen failed to prove that the goods in question were actually sold and known under that mark during the Imperial or Soviet era in the Baltic States or Poland, this because the evidence relied upon by Roshen only related to Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
We know that 187 people have been wrongly convicted in capital cases and ultimately exonerated since 1973.And there is little doubt that innocent people have been executed in this country.On Monday, May 23, in Shinn v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:55 am
And if any of them do win the nomination, and state forthrightly in the general campaign that they seek to overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 7/30/09Cite: IBM v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
Thus, the complaint does not state a cognizable cause of action to recover damages for invasion of privacy. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am by Bexis
  It was a little different, limited to allegations about marketing for use in children, an off-label use. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
Great case from the 9th District in State v. [read post]