Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 8,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
SIMPSON, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Mishcon De Reya Data Matters had a post “Data protection: UK Government sets out its position on “essential equivalence” between the UK and EU”. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
HENRY FRED MITCHELL, SR., DAVID W. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
Cariou v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Circuit in a different case, McKeever v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
Primarily as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
As a procedural matter, a revised U.K. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
[M]atters relating to reserved matters are also reserved. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
” The refusal to cooperate is a matter of stated policy. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
Wearry v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:11 am
Offutt, along with other firm lawyers and staff, spent considerable time and resources investigating . . . the matter and were distracted by the events and their aftermath.Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
(TorrentFreak) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names UDRP not suitable to obtain domain name originally registered with your consent – WIPO domain name decision in Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
[1] Tsosie v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
We have not second-guessed the FDA on matters as to which its competence vastly exceeds that of courts. [read post]