Search for: "Mark" Results 6101 - 6120 of 151,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2013, 3:53 am by John L. Welch
The Yankees established rights in the EVIL EMPIRE mark by showing that the public associated the mark with the Yankees. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:15 am
Consumers will not view the proposed mark , by itself, as a separable mark. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 In early 2016, a CEFCU employee saw the SDCCU mark on a billboard in San Diego, and in May 2017, CEFCU filed a petition to cancel the SDCCU registration based on its registered and claimed common-law marks.The complaint alleged that the CEFCU mark was more similar to the third party marks than to the SDCCU mark, and that if CEFCU asserted rights broad enough to encompass the SDCCU Mark, it therefore materially misrepresented to the USPTO that the… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:21 am
The fact that TMRR created the mark two years earlier and "promoted the mark" in seeking an entity that would offer the services does not mean it owned the mark. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am by Peter Groves
It would not be use of the UK trade mark in a third country, it would be the use of something identical to the UK trade mark, and therefore the agreement has to stop the junior trade mark owner doing anything outside the UK. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 3:17 am
Accordingly, the applicant maintained, the mark is merely suggestive because nothing in the mark itself conveys the understanding that the USPTO assigns to the mark, and therefore some imagination is needed to connect the mark to the goods and services.North Carolina conceded that the USPTO is allowed to consider the specimens of use to discern how a mark is used, but it argued that explanatory text on the specimens cannot supply additional meaning when… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:37 am
  Turning to the marks, the Board noted that famous marks merit a broader scope of protection than other marks. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:40 am
" It urged that its applied-for mark and its registered mark are legal equivalents, and therefore it is entitled to claim priority of its earlier mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:44 am
The Board found the mark to be too dissimilar to the KATE SPADE word mark and the "spade logo" mark to support Kate Spade's Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion and Section 43(c) dilution-by-blurring claims. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:08 am
In other words, we must anticipate Applicant’s mark being displayed in a manner that where the numeral 4, in 4IR, can appear in a manner such that the overall mark will look quite similar to Opposer’s AIR mark. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
Mark Alesia, Heather Gillers, Tim Evans and Mark Nichols report the results of a major Indianapolis Star investigation on who... [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:23 am
This attack site against Republican congressional candidate Rob Cornilles: A Mark Wiener production, or not a Mark Wiener production? [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:25 am
The Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 2008 The Trade Marks (Fees) Revocation Rules 2008 Source: www.opsi.gov.uk [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:50 am by David Canton
To protect a responsive mark like this, one would obviously register the main form. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:51 am by R. David Donoghue
And the situs of material facts was where marking decisions were made - New York - not where marked products were bought - Illinois. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:53 am by John L. Welch
" It found the standard character mark to be merely descriptive of the services and likely to cause confusion with two registered marks, and it found the logo mark unregistrable without a disclaimer of the phrase and likely to cause confusion with one of the registered marks. [read post]