Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6101 - 6120
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2006, 8:46 am
Does the mark Starpreya infringe the mark Starbucks? [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Bridgestone; Mark J.R. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Multilateralism v Bilateralism: What’s in it for international IP regulation? [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
The decision was rendered in the matter Marico Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:45 am
” Mark Walsh of Education Weekly’s School Law Blog and Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle discuss the denial in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
While the judgment in Independent Newspapers v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
In the case of GEICO v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The TMA clears the path for legitimate businesses to register their marks by cleaning out the federal trademark register and giving the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) the ability to expedite the registration process. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The AP has this article on Azimi v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
Sir Robin rounded the event off by giving Lord Neuberger a speech to mark his retirement from the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
United States, 480 U.S. 522–526 (1987) (per curiam)); see also Henson v. [read post]
