Search for: "People v. Day" Results 6101 - 6120 of 23,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 7:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Ellis In this case the People assert that the defendant is a level 3 sex offender. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm by HRWatchdog
 But it will be a nail biter, down to the last days of session to see what issues are ultimately addressed. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:32 pm by Brett Holubeck
Some examples are listed here: In the Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I described the key issues at stake in this 2017 post: In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am by Kalvis Golde
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
  Noting that because the defendant was not a regular occupant of the facility or a likely infringer, the Ninth Circuit affirmed an award of attorneys fees in his favor.[8] [1]Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). [2] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [3] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [4] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [5] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v… [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, back in the day, the officially atheistic Soviet Union banned and often punished same-sex sexual behavior—obviously, not a good reason for nonreligious people to do the same, but evidence that nonreligious people do indeed sometimes object to such behavior, and may similarly not want to be involved with same-sex weddings.) [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court [yesterday] to consider its appeal in the case of Martin v. [read post]