Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 6101 - 6120 of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm by Amy Howe
Supreme Court ordered the state supreme court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Foster v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by Kelly
Global Global – Copyright ACTA conclusion nears with ‘technical round’ set for late November (Michael Geist) Copying text off the net is not cool…or legal (Innovationpartners) Lessig calls for WIPO to lead overhaul of copyright system (IP Watch) Why sue when you can use social media? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Adam Steinman
Read correctly, the framework established by Twombly and Iqbal is not inconsistent with (to quote S. 1504) "the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:32 am by SHG
Does this comport with Bearden v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:54 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Police displayed the items at a news conference on Wednesday, including a mask made popular by the movie “V for Vendetta. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am by Bryn Miller
Key Takeaways for Local Public Agencies The census delay, SB 970, and emergency writ petition in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]