Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 7,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 11:20 pm
If the Bank chooses to ignore section 13 (3A), then, the entire action of the Bank under section 13 of the Act gets vitiated. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:17 pm
As per the Act, the first step would be to issue notice U/s. 13(2) by the authorised officer who is deemed to be armed with a money decree which attained finality. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 pm
Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act enables the secured creditor to take recourse to one or more of the measures to recover the secured debt as shown under Clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Section 13(4). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:14 pm
If the ‘Secured Asset’ is sought to be sold under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and SARFAESI Rules, then, the borrower can question the Sale under section 17 of the Act in view of the settled proposition now that the cause of action continues under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and pursuant to issuance of notice under section 13 (4). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
After classifying an account as NPA, the Bank or the authorized officer of the Bank will issue a demand notice to the borrower under section 13 (2) of the Act demanding the borrower to pay the entire outstanding due as on date.3. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:10 pm
The suit, therefore, in our view, was clearly barred by Section 34. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:07 pm
The Bank may be right in issuing notice under section 13 (2), giving reply to the objections under section 13 (3A), may be right in issuing possession notice under section 13 (4), but, they might be wrong in taking steps to auction the property and it gives right to the borrower to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal seeking relief. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:06 pm
The respondent-Bank had issued notice under Section 13 (2) of the Act in April, 2003, which is less than four years. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Section 264(a). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The mere reproduction of the result of considerations does not satisfy the requirement of a reasoned decision.The requirement to provide reasons for a decision aims at giving the parties and, in case, for example, of opposition appeal proceedings, the Board of appeal, the possibility of checking whether the decision that has been taken is justified in view of the decisive considerations, facts and evidence.[17] In the section entitled “Prior public use” […] the OD… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and ObscenIty Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
§ 107Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
This document is put out by the US Trustee’s Office to clarify common points of contention that debtors and their attorneys have stumbled upon when calculating chapter 13 disposable income. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
Furthermore, section 13 of the new Act allows the Supreme Court on appeal to substitute for any amount of damages awarded to a Plaintiff, such amount as it considers appropriate. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services in this state on a regular or routine basis; … [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
ISBNs 13: 9780199734924 and 10: 0199734925. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm
On January 13, 2011, the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
” Office Actions are not IQ tests for applicants or guessing games. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:46 pm
Consultations are available in office or by phone. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
When reading the book, he/she would find, among other things, that the second section of part VI.E.6.2.2.c) mentions, in its discussion of the decision in case T 828/94, that a monitoring system “should contain an independent cross-check” (emphasis by the Board) and could understand this to mean that such a cross-check does not mandatorily have to be implemented but rather is optional. [read post]
